Legal Opinion
Korshin v. Benedictine Hospital
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided February 2, 1999No. 1:98-cv-00677PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM — DECISION & ORDER
McAVOY, Chief Judge.
This is an antitrust case brought by an anesthesiologist against various hospitals and a group of anesthesiologists. Plaintiff Jonathan Korshin, M.D. (“Korshin”) claims violations of section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1 and section 4 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 15. 1 Korshin alleges that Benedictine Hospital (“Benedictine”), Kingston Hospital, and Northern Dutchess Hospital (“Northen Dutchess”) (collectively the “Hospitals”), in anticipation of a merger, entered into exclusive agreements with Defendant Cross River Anesthesiologists,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lloyd E. Boddie v. Officer B. Schnieder Officer D. Dewald Officer P. Robertson Sergeant K. Schmitt and Hearing Officer Mr. PicoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Beate Bernheim v. Jeffrey LittCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re Nine West Shoes Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Marsh v. Anesthesia Services Medical Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Nilavar v. Mercy Health System-Western OhioDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2000
- Untracht v. FikriDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
- Benjamin of Forest Hills Realty, Inc. v. Austin Sheppard Realty, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.