Legal Opinion

In Re Transkaryotic Therapies, Inc.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided June 24, 2008No. Consolidated Civil Action 2776-CCPublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHANDLER, Chancellor.

All corporate combinations leave in their wake certain artifacts — documents, emails, conversations, and notes. If one digs through enough of the rubble of a consummated merger, one will almost invariably find something questionable. A clever corporate archeologist can extrapolate from these suspicious artifacts and concoct a theory of malfeasance, disloyalty, and bad faith. Yet, theories alone cannot lead to liability. To survive a motion for summary judgment, such excavating plaintiffs must provide the Court with solid evidence of a genuine issue of material…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Schlesinger v. Reservists Committee to Stop the WarSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Kahn v. M & F Worldwide Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2014
  2. Chen v. Howard-AndersonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2014
  3. In re Rural Metro Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2014
  4. Burtch v. Seaport Capital, LLC (In re Direct Response Media, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2012
  5. Deutscher Tennis Bund v. Atp Tour, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API