In Re Transkaryotic Therapies, Inc.
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHANDLER, Chancellor.
All corporate combinations leave in their wake certain artifacts — documents, emails, conversations, and notes. If one digs through enough of the rubble of a consummated merger, one will almost invariably find something questionable. A clever corporate archeologist can extrapolate from these suspicious artifacts and concoct a theory of malfeasance, disloyalty, and bad faith. Yet, theories alone cannot lead to liability. To survive a motion for summary judgment, such excavating plaintiffs must provide the Court with solid evidence of a genuine issue of material…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Schlesinger v. Reservists Committee to Stop the WarSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Kahn v. M & F Worldwide Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2014
- Chen v. Howard-AndersonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2014
- In re Rural Metro Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2014
- Burtch v. Seaport Capital, LLC (In re Direct Response Media, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2012
- Deutscher Tennis Bund v. Atp Tour, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.