Legal Opinion

Willing v. Jensen

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 30, 1936No. 19244PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARIS, District Judge.

This is an action by the receiver of the Sixth National Bank for the amount of a 100 per cent, stock assessment made on 95 shares of the stock of the bank. The defendants filed an affidavit of defense, and the plaintiff has entered a rule for judgment on the ground that the de- ■ fense therein set up is insufficient. Among the facts admitted by or averred in the affidavit of defense, and which on this *597motion must be taken to be true, were the following:

On February 28, 1933, at 3.30 o’clock p. m., the bank suspended payments to depositors in the ordinary course and placed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rankin v. Fidelity Insurance, Trust & Safe Deposit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Anderson v. Philadelphia Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Kenyon v. FowlerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
  4. Robinson v. Southern National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  5. Kenyon v. FOWLERSupreme Court of the United States · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. WitherowCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
  2. Willing v. Pennsylvania Co. for Insurances on Lives & Granting AnnuitiesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Willing v. Argosy Building & Loan Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API