Willing v. Jensen
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MARIS, District Judge.
This is an action by the receiver of the Sixth National Bank for the amount of a 100 per cent, stock assessment made on 95 shares of the stock of the bank. The defendants filed an affidavit of defense, and the plaintiff has entered a rule for judgment on the ground that the de- ■ fense therein set up is insufficient. Among the facts admitted by or averred in the affidavit of defense, and which on this *597motion must be taken to be true, were the following:
On February 28, 1933, at 3.30 o’clock p. m., the bank suspended payments to depositors in the ordinary course and placed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rankin v. Fidelity Insurance, Trust & Safe Deposit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Anderson v. Philadelphia Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Kenyon v. FowlerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
- Robinson v. Southern National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Kenyon v. FOWLERSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Smith v. WitherowCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
- Willing v. Pennsylvania Co. for Insurances on Lives & Granting AnnuitiesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1937
- Willing v. Argosy Building & Loan Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1937