Legal Opinion

United States v. Kevin Mendonsa

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 30, 1993No. 91-30413PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUG, Circuit Judge:

This case involves a conditional plea of guilty to drug offenses and being a felon in possession of a firearm. Mendonsa contests the order denying suppression of evidence obtained from his residence in the execution of a search warrant. He asserts that there was not probable cause for the issuance of the warrant, that there was not good faith in executing it, and that the officers violated the “knock and announce” requirement of 18 U.S.C. § 3109 (1988).

The issues in this appeal are: (1) whether there was sufficient probable cause for the search warrant based on an anonymous…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. United States v. Stanley Mills StanertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  5. United States v. Hector Martin RamosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Rubin Sira v. R. Morton, C. Artuz, D. Selsky, and G. GoordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  2. United States v. Kenneth Eugene AllenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. Phillip James GreeneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. Aundre Sterling WrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. Justin Barrett HillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API