Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lamp v. First National Bank of Garretson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1993No. 17693Published

1DissentHenderson, Justice

Marjorie Lamp sued the wrong party, to-wit: The Garretson Bank — Bank was not, and is not, the wrongdoer. Carol Braa is the wrongdoer. Lamp is suing a target defendant.

Failure to give the requisite notice pursuant to SDCL 57A-4-406(4) is, by overwhelming authority, an absolute bar to suit on the alleged forged instrument. Spears Carpet Mills, Inc. v. Century National Bank of New Orleans, 85 B.R. 86 (W.D.Ark.1988); Jensen v. EssexBank, 396 Mass. 65, 483 N.E.2d 821, 41 U.C.C. Reporting Service 1366 (1985); Space Distributors, Inc. v. Flagship Bank of Melbourne, 402 So.2d 586, 32 U.C.C.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Camfield Tires, Inc. v. Michelin Tire CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
  2. Pine Bluff National Bank v. KestersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  3. Hackworth v. LarsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Indiana National Corp. v. FACO, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Jensen v. EssexbankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API