Grimes v. Hoschler
California Supreme Court
1DissentBurke, J.
I dissent. The majority find that Business and Professions Code section 7113.5 conflicts with the objectives of the federal Bankruptcy Act (11 U.S.C. § 1 et seq.) and is therefore invalid under the supremacy clause (U.S. Const., art. VI, cl. 2). My colleagues feel compelled in reaching this result to overrule our unanimous decision in Tracy v. Contractors’ State License Board, 63 Cal.2d 598 [47 Cal.Rptr. 561, 407 P.2d 865], I cannot concur in this holding because I believe section 7113.5 is supported by a sound public policy and was correctly characterized by this court in Tracy (p. 600) as…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Perez. v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hope v. Contractors' State License BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Tracy v. Contractors' State License BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Hopkins v. Contractors' State License BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966