Legal Opinion

Britton v. Noe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 29, 2000Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Order and judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted that part of the motion of Darryl Noe (defendant) seeking summary judgment dismissing the cause of action pursuant to General Obligations Law § 11-100. David J. Britton (Britton), then age 16, attended a party hosted by defendant’s younger sister Audrey, also age 16, in her parents’ absence. At Audrey’s request, defendant procured alcoholic beverages for consumption at the party. According to the complaint, Britton was injured due to the intoxication of fellow guest Matthew Karoglen, then age…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morgan v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Griffin v. LardoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Bierach v. NicholsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Heminway v. State UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. Givens v. Rochester City School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API