Sills v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.
The accused was charged with rape and convicted of assault and battery. The only two special grounds of his motion for a new trial allege error because the court charged on assault and battery. Part, of the testimony in the case, if believed by the jury, would authorize a conviction of this offense. “It is conceded that a verdict of assault, or of assault and battery, or of assault with intent to commit a rape, may be founded upon an indictment for rape. An assault or assault and battery is necessarily involved in every case of rape. Speer v. State, 60 Ga. 381, 382; Goldin v. State, 104 Ga.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Watson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
- Goldin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Speer v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. GarneyIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
- United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999