Legal Opinion

Sills v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 9, 1926No. 17559PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.

The accused was charged with rape and convicted of assault and battery. The only two special grounds of his motion for a new trial allege error because the court charged on assault and battery. Part, of the testimony in the case, if believed by the jury, would authorize a conviction of this offense. “It is conceded that a verdict of assault, or of assault and battery, or of assault with intent to commit a rape, may be founded upon an indictment for rape. An assault or assault and battery is necessarily involved in every case of rape. Speer v. State, 60 Ga. 381, 382; Goldin v. State, 104 Ga.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Watson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  3. Goldin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  4. Speer v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. GarneyIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
  2. United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  3. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  4. United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API