Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Mercantile Bank & Trust Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 20, 1926No. 9722. [fn*]Published

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing.

JONES, C. J.

At a former day of this term, appellee’s motion to dismiss this appeal was granted. The ground of the motion was that the amount in controversy did not exceed $100, this being a suit to recover on an alleged debt of less than $100 and to foreclose a chattel mortgage on an automobile of the value of $100.

Appellant has filed a motion for rehearing, claiming that, in the court below, he filed a cross-action for damages against appellee in the sum of $150. It appears from the agreed case that an exception was sustained to the cross-action asserted by appellant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. ArnoldTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Connor v. SewellTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Continental Casualty Co. v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
  4. Bledsoe v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1894
  5. Smith v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API