Thillens, Inc. v. Fryzel
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, District Judge.
Thillens, Inc. (“Thillens”) has brought a four-count Amended Complaint (the “Complaint”) 1 against Michael E. Fryzel (“Fryz-el”) in his individual capacity as the Director of the Department of Financial Institutions of the State of Illinois (“DFI”). Because Thillens invokes several patently inapplicable bases for his lawsuit, 2 the only ones that merit any discussion at all are those alleging:
1. unlawful deprivation of Thillens’ civil rights in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”) (Count I);
2. conspiracy and “neglect or refusal to…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Alabama v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.