Legal Opinion

Thillens, Inc. v. Fryzel

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided April 7, 1989No. 88 C 7714Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, District Judge.

Thillens, Inc. (“Thillens”) has brought a four-count Amended Complaint (the “Complaint”) 1 against Michael E. Fryzel (“Fryz-el”) in his individual capacity as the Director of the Department of Financial Institutions of the State of Illinois (“DFI”). Because Thillens invokes several patently inapplicable bases for his lawsuit, 2 the only ones that merit any discussion at all are those alleging:

1. unlawful deprivation of Thillens’ civil rights in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”) (Count I);

2. conspiracy and “neglect or refusal to…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Alabama v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API