Legal Opinion

Collier v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 11, 1962No. 2931PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Chief Judge.

Appellant, a real estate broker, had in his employ as sales manager, one Martin. It was Martin’s duty, in appellant’s absence, to receive from salesmen deposits made by prospective buyers. On one occasion Martin received from a salesman a cash deposit of $500, but failed to deliver it to appellant or to properly account for it. The prospective sale did not materialize, and appellant, being obligated to return the deposit, was forced to pay it from his own funds. He then brought this action against the surety on Martin’s real estate salesman’s bond.1

The trial court granted…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Eberman v. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945
  2. Gilewicz v. Home Indemnity CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1959
  3. National Surety Corporation v. KneelandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  4. Phoenix Assurance Co. v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Middelsteadt v. KarpeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API