Legal Opinion · Dissent

Thornton v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 3, 2015No. CR-15-287Published

1Dissent

BAKER AND GOODSON, JJ.,

DISSENT.

Subsequent to the majority’s disposition in Thornton I, Thornton filed a writ of mandamus in which Thornton sought to have this court direct the circuit court judge to enter an amended order reflecting the dismissal, of the capital-murder charge by this court in Thornton I. . We denied the writ, and held,

[O]ur decision reversed and dismissed petitioner’s conviction for capital murder; there was no remand requiring any action by the trial court. Because the trial court was not directed to enter an amended judgment, petitioner has not established that Judge Jones…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Parker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  2. Ginn v. Penobscot CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
  3. Thornton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  4. Dowell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  5. United States v. Merle O. Greene, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API