Legal Opinion · Dissent

Telcoe Credit Union v. Eackles

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 20, 1987No. 87-93Published

1DissentJohn I. Purtle, Justice

I disagree that the trial court should have granted a directed verdict in favor of Telcoe. I believe it was a fact question as to whether Telcoe had waived the requirement of a tender by making it clear, through its manager, Mrs. Sarah Mosely, that Telcoe would release Mrs. Eackles’ car only upon payment of the entire amount due, that is, the balance of the unsecured debt plus the$535.17 due on the debt secured by the automobile.

Mrs. Eackles testified that she offered to pay the $535 due on the car loan, but was told by Mrs. Mosely that she would have to pay both loans before the car would be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Owens v. Automobile Recovery Bureau, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Hollowoa v. BuckSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  3. Read's Drug Store v. Hessig-Ellis Drug Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  4. Athans v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  5. Miller v. WilleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API