Legal Opinion
Casebeer v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 16, 1937No. 1420PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.
The record contains neither assignments of error nor bill of exceptions. The only question presented for review is the sufficiency of the indictment.
12 U.S.C.A. §§ 588a, 588b and 588c read as follows:
“Definition As used in section 588b of this title the term ‘bank’ includes any member bank of the Federal Reserve System, and any bank, banking association, trust company, savings bank, or other banking institution organized or operating under the laws of the United States and any insured bank as defined in subsection (c) of section 264 of this title.” 12 U.S.C.A. § 588a.
"R…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Hagner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Gavieres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- United States v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Morgan v. DevineSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Hewitt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Madsen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
- Webb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
- Durrett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
- Arthur Mares v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.