Crosby v. State

Bernes, Judge.

A jury convicted James Curtis Crosby of three counts of theft by shoplifting. Following the denial of his motion for new trial, Crosby appeals, contending that there was insufficient evidence to convict him of the charged offenses; that the trial court should have granted his motion to sever the three counts; and that the trial court erred in limiting the cross-examination of two state witnesses. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm.

1. In reviewing Crosby’s conviction, we construe the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict of guilty. Adams v. State, 284 Ga.…