Legal Opinion

Seemann v. Maxwell

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided January 7, 1998No. 97-CV-913 (FJS)PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER

SCULLIN, District Judge.

Introduction

This negligence action arose out of a fight between two canines which were owned by Defendant’s tenant and Plaintiffs. In essence, Plaintiffs, M. James Seemann (“Seemann”) and Stephanie Sheehan (“Sheehan”), claim that Defendant, Dennis Maxwell (“Maxwell”), was negligent in renting his house to the particular tenant and, as a result, Plaintiffs suffered physical injury and other damages. Presently before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1),…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
  2. Louisville, Cincinnati, & Charleston Rail-Road v. LetsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
  3. Leveraged Leasing Administration Corp. v. Pacificorp Capital, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Alaidrus v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2025
  2. Canale v. DoeDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2025
  3. Fisher v. Glens Falls HospitalDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2025
  4. Herman Lute Woods, II, Estate v. Dewitt Town Court, et al.District Court, N.D. New York · 2025
  5. Johnson v. ChumskyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API