Legal Opinion

Orsini v. Lathrop Co.

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided March 21, 1950No. 6330Published

1Opinion of the Court

PRATT, District Judge.

In plaintiff’s complaint it is alleged:

That commencing with the month of December, 1943, plaintiff was employed by the defendant as an accountant. In 1944 his salary was fixed in a definite sum, plus one-third of 5 % of the gross threatre intake of the defendant. This agreement continued until the 7th day of June, 1949, when defendant reduced plaintiff’s salary to $12,000 a year, retroactive to January 1, 1948. In 1948 plaintiff’s salary'amounted to $16,575.00 (that there is an error in plaintiff’s allegation that the $12,000.00 salary was retroactive to January 1, 1948,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re New York County Lawyers Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  2. Quarture Et Ux. v. Allegheny Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Lange v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
  4. Rabon v. State Finance CorporationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
  5. Mackintosh v. ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API