Legal Opinion

Chafee v. Gardner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 10, 1992PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Tait, Jr., J.), entered August 23, 1991 in Madison County, which denied plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend the complaint.

Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint to increase the ad damnum clause from $100,000 to $1,000,000 (see, Beuschel v Malm, 114 AD2d 569; cf., Davis v City of Troy, 57 AD2d 990). An important factor to be considered is whether the motion was promptly made after discovery of the facts upon which the amendment is predicated and this factor takes on greater significance when…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Beuschel v. MalmAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. Dolan v. Garden City Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Sylvester v. StephensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. Davis v. City of TroyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thibeault v. PalmaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. Henderson v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Hojnacki v. BoutonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API