Legal Opinion
South Carolina v. United States
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided October 31, 2016No. Civil Action No. 1:16-cv-00391-JMCPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
J. MICHELLE CHILDS, United States District Court Judge
The State of South Carolina (“the State”) filed a Complaint (ECF No. 1) alleging that Defendants United States, the United States Department of Energy (“DOE”), Dr. Ernest Moniz, the National Nuclear Security Administration (“NNSA”), and Lieutenant General Frank G. Klotz (collectively “Defendants”) failed to adhere to statutory obligations within 50 U.S.C. § 2566. This matter is before the court pursuant to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 17) the State’s Complaint (ECF No. 1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness AllianceSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Lane v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- South Carolina v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2017
- South Carolina v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2017
- FUNKHOUSER v. BROWNDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2024
- KING v. LUCUSDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2025
- R.V. v. MnuchinDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020