Legal Opinion

Folly Amusement Holding Corp. v. Randforce Amusement Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 5, 1939PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HULBERT, District Judge.

There are eleven motions addressed to the complaint.

Plaintiff sues to recover treble damages for alleged violation of the Sherman AntiTrust Law, Title 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1, 2, 7, and the Clayton Anti-Trust Act, 15 U.S. C.A. §§ 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 22 and 23.

Summarizing the rather voluminous complaint, without effort to embellish the substance of the allegations, plaintiff is a New York corporation and leased a theatre at 15 Debevoise St., Brooklyn (Eastern District), known as the “Folley” from the Hyde & Behman Corporation for a period of ten years to commence on…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Steiner v. 20th Century-Fox Film Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  2. United States v. Schine Chain Theatres, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1940
  3. Folley Amusement Holding Corp. v. Randforce Amusement Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1940
  4. Steiner v. 20th Century-Fox Film CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  5. Moran v. ShubertDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API