Legal Opinion
Vincent v. Consolidated Operating Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided March 31, 1994No. 93-05236PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Per curiam
Defendants Consolidated Operating Co. (“Consolidated”) and Mission Insurance Co. (“Mission”) appeal from the entry of summary judgment against them. The district court held that the defendants had violated a valid order under the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (“LHWCA”) ordering them to pay compensation to plaintiff/appellee Thomas Vincent. We AFFIRM.
I
Vincent was injured three times while in Consolidated’s employ, once in December 1985, again in February 1986, and again in March 1986. Vincent sought compensation for his injuries under the LHWCA 1 The parties stipulated that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ellis D. Burrell v. Jimmy Newsome, Chief of Police, Port Arthur Police Dept.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Ceres Gulf and Esis/ina v. Cleaster Cooper, Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs (u.s. Department of Labor), Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Richardson v. OldhamCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Hole v. Miami Shipyards Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Dee Ann Pemberton v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Illinois CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Wheat v. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Boland Marine & Manufacturing Co. v. RihnerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- United States Leather, Inc. v. H & W PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Wilkens v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Darouiche v. Fidelity National InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.