Legal Opinion

In Re: Ohio Execution Protocol Litigation

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided September 23, 2019No. 2:11-cv-01016Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION AT COLUMBUS IN RE: OHIO EXECUTION : Case No. 2:11-cv-1016 PROTOCOL LITIGATION District Judge Edmund A. Sargus, Jr.1 : Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz This document relates to: Plaintiffs Cleveland Jackson, James Hanna, : Kareem Jackson, and Melvin Bonnell DECISION AND ORDER ON ADMISSION OF STATEMENTS OF GOVERNOR DEWINE This consolidated method of execution case under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

is before the Court on Motion of Plaintiffs Cleveland Jackson, James Hanna, Kareem Jackson, and Melvin Bonnell to admit in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1974
  3. Hercules Inc. v. Exxon Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977
  4. United States v. William StiversCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  5. United States v. DakotaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API