People v. Taing
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Tenth Judicial District, Colusa County. The defendant was convicted of murder, and appealed from the judgment and from an order made denying his motion for a new trial. The other facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court:
A document will not constitute a part of a bill of exceptions, unless it be incorporated therein, or be therein referred to in such manner as to identify it. The Reporter’s notes are brought up with the record in this case; but as they are not even referred to in the bill of exceptions, they constitute no part thereof, and cannot be considered on this appeal.
The defendant challenged one of the jurors on the ground of actual bias ; but the record does not show any exception to the decision of the Court in the admission or rejection of testimony upon the trial of the challenge. The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. VasquezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- People v. CottaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
3Cited by8 opinions
- North v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
- People v. BemmerlyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- State v. GrayNevada Supreme Court · 1885
- Adams v. Elliott, Et VirSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
- People v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.