Legal Opinion

Neeley v. STATE COMPENSATION DEPARTMENT

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1967PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.

In this action for benefits under the Workmen’s Compensation Law as it existed in 1964, the workman appeals a denial of relief at the circuit-court level based upon a finding that the court was without jurisdiction because of his failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. We affirm that judgment.

Prior to July 1, 1964, the workman was employed as fire chief by the Winston-Dillard Rural Fire Department in Douglas County. His employment was, by mutual agreement, to terminate on July 1, 1964. He was, prior to July 1, 1964, a covered workman within the meaning of ORS 656.122. On June 27,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Unemployment Compensation Comm'n of Alaska v. AragonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Burrows v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  3. McDermott v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Application of Portland General Elec. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. South of Sunnyside Neighborhood League v. Board of CommissionersOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Mullenaux v. State Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Saxon v. Division of State LandsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  5. Application of Portland General Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API