Scopillitti v. State
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
VICKERY, J
It might here be pointed out that the defendant probably had waived his right to object to the proceedings by not filing a plea in abatement, i The fact of defendant’s minority was a defect extrinsic to the record, and §13439-7, being old §13622 GC, read's: “A plea in abatement may be made ,when there is a defect in the record shown by facts extrinsic thereto.”
In the case of State of Ohio v Klingen berger, 113 Oh St, 419, it was held in syllabus one as follows:
“A minor charged with felony waives his right to object to the jurisdiction of the Court of Common Pleas on the ground of…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Ex Parte LewisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1947
- State v. DehlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- In Re the Welfare of S. V.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Clay v. Mountain Valley Mineral Ltd. PartnershipWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
- State Ex Rel. Pett v. JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.