Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mercy Health System of Northwest Arkansas v. McGraw

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided August 28, 2013No. CV-13-229Published

1DissentKenneth S. Hixson, Judge

I agree with the majority that the issue of contributory negligence was not properly argued below and was not preserved for appeal. However, I dissent from the majority’s decision to uphold the judgment based on McGraw’s promissory-estoppel claim. I am guided primarily by our supreme court’s recent holding in Courtyard Gardens Health & Rehabilitation, LLC v. Quarles, 2013 Ark. 228, 428 S.W.3d 437, that while the statements of an alleged agent may be admissible to corroborate other evidence tending to establish agency, neither agency nor the scope of agency can be established by declarations…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Courtyard Gardens Health & Rehabilitation, LLC v. QuarlesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  2. Walker v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982
  3. D.B. Griffin Warehouse, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Sterne, Agee & Leach, Inc. v. WayCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
  5. Rigsby v. RigsbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API