Legal Opinion

Womble v. . Leigh

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 7, 1928PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStaoy, C. J.

Under tbe principles announced in Monger v. Lutterloh, ante, 274, in which tbe opinion was written with a view to tbe facts of tbe present case also, as tbe two cases were argued tbe same day and present identical questions, a new trial must be awarded for error in tbe following instruction to tbe jury:

“If she is entitled to recover at all, she is entitled to recover out of him (defendant) tbe present value, present lump sum of money which would be worth $38,500, payable in monthly installments of five hundred dollars per month, running from tbis period up to November, 1933, that is to say,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Connecticut Railway & Lighting Co. v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Leo v. Pearce Stores Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1932
  3. Curran v. Smith-Zollinger Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1931
  4. Kearns v. Gay Apparel Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API