Bassil v. Loffer
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from, Keokuk District Court. This action is brought to obtain partition of certain real . property, in which the plaintiffs claim to be the owners of an undivided one-half interest, and which they allege the defendants to be owners of the other undivided one-half interest. From the overruling of a demurrer to the petition defendants appeal. The further facts of the case appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Miller, Ch. J.
— The statements of the petition show that the plaintiffs are husband and wife and have so ‘been for thirty years past; that on the 20th day of August, 1866, one Eeason P. Loffer intermarried with Mollie S. Bassil, the daughter of plaintiffs, to whom was afterwards born as the fruit of said marriage one child only who was named Milo J. Loffer; that *452on the 5th day of October, 1868, said Reason P. Loffer became the owner in fee of the west half of the east half of the northeast quarter of Section 9, Tp. 75, Range, 12 west; that on the 8th day of February, 1873, the said Mollie,…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Caulfield v. NoonanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
- Sparks v. BodensickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
- Murphy v. MurphySupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
- Young v. McGuanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
- Smallman v. PowellOregon Supreme Court · 1890
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.