Legal Opinion

In re Roberts

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1879Published

Appeal from an order made at Special Term, denying the petitioner’s application to vacate certain assessments.

1Per curiam

An examination of the proceedings in this matter fails to reveal any ground for vacating the assessment, complained of, and we might, perhaps, with propriety, rest our decision upon the brief opinion expressed by Mr. Justice Lawrence on denying the petitioner's application. But we think it bettor to elaborate the views expressed by him. The act of 1813 (chap. 86) directs the mode in which the expenses of local improvements shall be ascertained and assessed. It provides that the mayor, etc., shall appoint such skillful and disinterested persons as they may think proper, to make the estimate…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of Petition of Ferdinand MayerNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Matter of ZborowskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Manice v. . the Mayor, Aldermen C., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
  4. Wetmore v. CampbellThe Superior Court of New York City · 1849

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API