Legal Opinion

Sather Banking Co. v. Hartwig

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1898PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action of replevin to recover possession of certain almonds.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.

The action is in replevin to recover the possession of 329 sacks of almonds shipped from California to New York, December 14, 1895, by Porter Brothers & Co., a San Erancisco firm,, on car No. 3806 of the Sunset Boute,. Southern Pacific Co. On the day of the shipment, Porter Brothers & Oo. drew their draft on Thos. Boberts & Co., of Philadelphia, Pa., the consignees, for $1,458.33, payable to the order of the plaintiff, a California banking institution, and the plaintiff discounted the draft, taking as collateral security the bill of lading for the goods. The draft was neither accepted nor…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Herring v. . HoppockNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  2. Campbell v. . WoodworthNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  3. Barnett v. . SellingNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  4. Ford & Rockwood v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
  5. Cayuga County National Bank v. DanielsNew York Court of Appeals · 1872

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. BIOCONVERGENCE LLC v. ATTARIWALADistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2023
  2. Coblin v. DePuy Orthopaedics IncDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2024
  3. FA ND Chev, LLC v. KupperDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2025
  4. Parker v. BursorDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API