F. C. Austin Manufacturing Co. v. Decker
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Muscatine District Gourt. — IioN. Jakes M. Boelinger, Judge. ActioN at law for tlie purchase price of a well-making outfit. There was a trial to a jury, resulting in a verdict and judgment for plaintiff, and defendant'the Union Bank of AYilton appeals.'
1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.
On July 16, 1895, the defendant Decker ordered of plaintiff a well-making outfit, for which he agreed to pay the sum of four hundred dollars upon delivery of the machine. On the back of the order was a certificate described as a banker’s certificate of deposit, which reads as follows: 1 “July 16, 1895. F. 0. Austin Manufacturing Company, Chicago, Ill.: Mr. J. I. Decker, of Wilton Junction, Iowa, has this day deposited with us, in legal tender, four hundred dollars, with Ohieago exchange, *280subject to your order when machine is set up and works satisfactorily. Union Bank of Wilton, J. L.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Morris v. . RexfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Moller v. . TuskaNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Kearney Milling & Elevator Co. v. Union Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1896
3Cited by12 opinions
- Waters v. PearsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
- Associates Discount Corporation v. HeldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
- Amazon Fire Ins. Co. v. BondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Home Savings Bank v. OtterbachSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Murray v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.