Legal Opinion

Bethune v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided January 30, 1934No. 7 Div. 991, 992PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

The two appellants were jointly indicted, jointly tried, and both were convicted as charged in the indictment. The indictment contained three counts and in proper form and substance charged them with the unlawful possession of a still to be used for the purpose of manufacturing prohibited liquors or beverages; and, also with the offense of distilling, making, or manufacturing alcoholic, spirituous, malted, or mixed liquors or beverages, a part of which w:as alcohol, etc. From the judgment of conviction, this appeal was taken.

The record proper in this transcript is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Henson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. England v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Love v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. Hern v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. Narrell v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1933

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pierce v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973
  2. Stone v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. Gilchrist v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1937
  4. Bethune v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  5. Williams v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API