Wall v. Cotton

There- is much pleading and many exceptions to rulings of the court both on the pleadings and the admission of evidence. As we view this record, • all- these rulings may be ignored as being immaterial. Whatever the rulings may have- been the result of the trial must have been the same.

The damages claimed were for the negligent injury to plaintiff’s automobile by reason of it having been struck by defendants’ truck. The evidence discloses, without conflict, that defendants’ truck was being operated upon the Wetumpka-Tallassee Highway at night, and without complying with section 6264 of the…