Legal Opinion

Clinton v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 11, 1940PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The plaintiff in error was charged in an information with having possessed beverages of an alcoholic content of more than 14 per centum, by weight, in containers lacking excise liquor stamps and with having theretofore “plead guilty in this court” of the same offense and having been “adjudged by the court guilty of said charge * * (Chapter 16774, Laws of Florida, Acts of 1935, Sec. 15.)

He urges that the allegation of the prior prosecution was insufficient because it was not specifically averred that the defendant had been formerly convicted of the crime, that being the particular expression…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1918
  2. Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1913

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Vazquez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  2. Miller v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. State v. DixonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  4. Sinkfield v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API