Legal Opinion

State Of Washington v. Rickey M. Rainey

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 24, 2014No. 68846-4Published

1Opinion of the Court

D I.-. i C vi iinJ^'i'1' ' 20!sFlu£h ;ii!0:5l IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 68846-4- Respondent, v. RICKEY MITCHELL RAINEY, PUBLISHED OPINION Appellant. FILED: February 24, 2014 Verellen, J. — During a hearing on Rickey Rainey's motion for a new trial, the trial court closed the courtroom, conducted an in camera review, and concluded that a witness could assert her Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. The witness did not take the stand or personally assert the privilege in open court before the in camera proceeding…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., County of RiversideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. State v. Bone-ClubWashington Supreme Court · 1995

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API