Legal Opinion

Miller v. Bell South Phone Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 8, 2003No. 1D02-4074PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Nortwick, J.

In this workers’ compensation appeal, Edward Miller, claimant below, appeals a final order denying compensability of his claim. Claimant argues that, because the final order was entered after the judge of compensation claims (JCC) reversed an earlier order recusing herself and reasserted control over the case, the order denying compensation is void and without effect. We agree and reverse.

Florida law is clear that once a judge recuses himself or herself for whatever reason, the judge may not thereafter reconsider the recusal decision and reassert judicial authority over the case. Deberry v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Margulies v. MarguliesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  2. Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  3. Meaweather v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  4. State v. SchackDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  5. Deberry v. WardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Day v. Secretary, Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2021
  2. Franxman v. FranxmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API