Legal Opinion
Daneshvar v. Kipke
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided July 19, 2017No. Case No. 2:13-cv-13096PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS11 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [134]
STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III, United States District Judge
The case concerns a dispute between a former student at the University of Michigan and his faculty advisor. Plaintiff Eugene Daneshvar alleges that Defendant Daryl Kipke stole and patented Danesh-var’s idea for a device used to facilitate deep brain stimulation. Neuronexus Technologies — a company founded by Kipke that researches and patents medical devices — is a co-defendant. Daneshvar brought an action for correction of inven-torship and…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Ovall Dale Kendall v. The Hoover CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Spears v. ConsultingDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2018
- Burns & Wilcox, LTD., A Michigan Corporation v. CRC INSURANCE SERVICES INC.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
- Radiant Global Logistics, Inc. v. Furstenau, Jr.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021