State v. Anderson

TITUS, Judge.

Defendant was jury-convicted of second degree burglary and sentenced to two years’ imprisonment. He appealed.

In determining defendant’s first point, i.e., the sufficiency vel non of the evidence to sustain the conviction, we accept as true all evidence which tends to prove defendant’s guilt and indulge all reasonable inferences favorable to the state. State v. Potter, 530 S.W.2d 268, 270[2] (Mo.App. 1975).

Briefly, the evidence was this: Near 9 p. m. on the day involved, an employee of a supermarket located across the street from the burglarized store observed a man in the market…