Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Minnesota Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. United States

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided March 3, 1931No. 3302 — 537PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ATWELL, District Judge.

All of ■ the provisions mentioned .by the two subdivisions of section 136, USCA, title 26, for the removal of a lien against real estate, have been complied with. The suit is justified by the permission therein given.

The proof shows that the lien of the United States upon the real estate described for income taxes is junior to the lien under which the plaintiffs claim. Prior to the fixing of the government lien the real estate was incumbered for the sum of $104,000, which now amounts to approximately $113,000. Disin- terestod qualified witnesses fix the present maximum…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. SnyderSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. County of Spokane v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. Foster v. ReddingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
  4. Sherwood v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1925
  5. Ormsbee v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Glass City Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. United States v. O. E. Morrison and R. E. MorrisonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  3. United States v. SampsellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
  4. United States v. W. W. Boyd, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  5. Trust Co. of Texas v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1933

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API