Buckman v. . Bragaw
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBeosdeN, J.
It was conceded that tbe plaintiffs cannot recover upon a breach of warranty.
Tbe question therefore presented for solution is whether or not a purchaser at a trustee’s sale of land under a deed of trust or a mortgage, can recover for a shortage of land in the absence of any representation made by the seller except such as may be contained in the advertisement or the deed of the trustee or mortgagee.
In Smathers v. Gilmer, 126 N. C., p. 759, the principles of law governing such eases are thus expressed: “The plaintiff had two opportunities for protection: 1. A simple calculation, according to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Galloway v. . GoolsbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- Turner v. . VannSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Duffy v. . PhippsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
- Lantz v. . HowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gore v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- McPherson v. PurdueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- Oates v. Jag, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984