Legal Opinion
Donohoe v. BONNEVILLE INT'L CORP.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 27, 2009No. Civil Action 07-949 (RWR)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Leo Donohoe brings this action against his former employer Bonneville In ternational Corporation, alleging that Bonneville discriminated against him on the basis of his age, in violation of the District of Columbia Human Rights Act, D.C.Code § 2-1401 et seq. Donohoe has filed five sets of objections to discovery rulings made by the magistrate judge. Because Donohoe has not shown error in rulings denying him leave to multiply his allotted number of depositions, his objections will be overruled except as to leave to depose…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Sprint/United Management Co. v. MendelsohnSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Alexander v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- Mitchell v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- United States ex rel. Fago v. M & T Mortgage Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Graham v. MukaseyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Slate v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Abt v. SalazarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Slate v. American Broadcasting CompaniesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- (PC) Byrd v. UnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.