State v. Robertson
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtDaniel E. Scott, P.J.
By bench trial, Appellant was found guilty of sodomy. Given the nature of the case, we will cite only those facts needed to explain why we deny Appellant’s two points and affirm his conviction.
Point I
Appellant, who did not testify at his trial, alleges plain error because the trial court did not inform him of his constitutional right to testify. Appellant cites no authority for this alleged obligation and a Missouri case is to the contrary.
Prudential considerations notwithstanding, a trial judge “has no duty to inquire from a criminal defendant who remains silent throughout the proceedings…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. GriffithMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. McCartyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- State v. EdwardsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. RoseMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. AdkisonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. AndersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017