Legal Opinion

Creighton v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1943PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDeyo, J.

This action is brought to recover disability benefits payable under a supplemental contract of insurance issued by the defendant on June 25, 1930, in the event the plaintiff should become totally disabled “ as the result of bodily injury or disease occurring after the issuance of said policy.” By stipulation it is admitted that the alleged disability is the result of tuberculosis which originated, to the plaintiff’s knowledge, prior to the issuance of the policy; that the plaintiff was under treatment for this disease at a sanitarium from January 22, 1929, to June 9,1930, and that the disease…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hartol Products Corp. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. Johnson v. Travelers Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Apter v. Home Life Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  4. Johnson v. Humboldt InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Cohen v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mills v. Aetna Insurance CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API