Legal Opinion

Winegard v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 8, 1970No. 69-581PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Appellant’s motion for post conviction relief under Cr.P.R. 1.850 was summarily denied by the lower court on the ground that the motion and the files and records in the case conclusively showed that appellant was entitled to no relief. The record on appeal, however, does not conclusively show that appellant’s plea of guilty was voluntary, because there is no transcript of the arraignment proceedings. Boykin v. Alabama, 1969, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed. 274; Rudolph v. State, Fla.App.1969, 230 So.2d 14; Steinhauser v. State, Fla.App.1969, 228 So.2d 446. For this reason appellant is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Steinhauser v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  3. Rudolph v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Clements v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API