Norris v. Clark
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 41, Oct T., 1905, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Clearfield Co., Sept. T., 1904, No. 469, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Mabel E. Norris and S. W. Norris v. H. E. Clark. Assumpsit for the cutting and delivery of logs. Before Smith:, P. J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff for $182.49. Defendant appealed. Errors assigned (1-21) sufficiently appear by the opinion of the Superior Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Morrison, J.,
On December 17, 1901, the plaintiffs and defendant entered into a written contract under which the plaintiffs agreed to deliver certain cut logs and to cut, peel and deliver a considerable quantity of timber to the defendant at a mill site to be thereafter located, by the defendant, on Chest creek. -The plaintiffs proceeded with the work and on July 5, 1902, they had performed considerable work under the contract, but had not delivered any of the logs on Chest creek because the defendant had not designated a site for his mill. On July 5, 1902, the parties met and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hartman v. MeighanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Pallman v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
- Martin v. SchoenbergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1845
- Gill v. Johnstown Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
- Caughey v. ParkerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- William P. Kelley Brick Co. v. Clay Product Supply Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1907