Legal Opinion
United States v. Arturo Gonzalez and Ricardo Ramirez
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided August 14, 1996No. 95-2297, 95-2298PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.
After a six-day trial, Arturo Gonzalez and Ricardo Ramirez were convicted on the three counts with which they had been charged: conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and to distribute heroin (21 U.S.C. § 846); possession of heroin with intent to distribute (21 U.S.C. § 841; 18 U.S.C. § 2); and using and carrying a firearm during and in relation to the commission of drug trafficking crimes (18 U.S.C. § 924(c)). The defendants’ first motion for a new trial was denied. However, when the defendants filed a supplemental posttrial motion for new trial, based on newly…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Smith v. Secretary, Dept. of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. James R. TurcotteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Manuel Antonio NORIEGA, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Maurice CookeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Robert T. Mitrione and Marla A. DevoreCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.