Legal Opinion

Snody v. Shier

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1891PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Case made from Huron. (Beach, J.). Assumpsit. Plaintiff assigns error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This action was tried in the circuit court for the county of Huron without a jury, and the court found the following facts and conclusions of law:

“1. That on or about the 1st day of June, 1887, the defendant proposed to purchase of the plaintiff’s agent at Hbly, in said county, a Meadow Lark mower for $50 cash, or $55 on time. The mower was not in stock at the time, and defendant was permitted to take an old mower until the new one could be delivered. A printed form of warranty was furnished to the defendant when he made his order, as follows:
*305“ ‘ Remove this warranty, and give the purchaser…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Moon v. Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Canham v. Plano Manufacturing Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
  3. D. M. Osborne & Co. v. BakerMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  4. D. M. Osborne & Co. v. BakerMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API