The PEOPLE v. Pigrenet
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Daily
Defendant, Joseph Pigrenet, was found guilty of unlawfully possessing narcotic drugs after a bench trial in the criminal court of Cook County and was sentenced to the penitentiary for a term of not less than three nor more than five years. He prosecutes this writ of error contending solely that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the verdict. In particular, defendant insists that a conviction for unlawful possession of narcotics requires affirmative evidence that the accused knows he has narcotics in his possession and contends that such proof was lacking in this case.
Relevant evidence…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- The People v. MacKIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
- The PEOPLE v. NettlesIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
- The PEOPLE v. EmbryIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
- State v. NicolosiSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
- The People v. RichardsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Ritter v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1970
- Clodfelter v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977
- The PEOPLE v. HendersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. ConnieAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
- People v. MillsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.