Legal Opinion

Gary Michael Bloom v. William James Campbell, III

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided February 3, 2026No. 1:24-cv-10339Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ____________________________________ ) GARY MICHAEL BLOOM, ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 24-10339-RGS ) WILLIAM JAMES CAMPBELL, III, ) Defendant. ) ) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED MOTION FOR RULE 11 SANCTIONS [Docket No. 137] February 3, 2026 Boal, U.S.M.J. Plaintiff Gary M. Bloom1 has moved for sanctions against defendant William James Campbell, III pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Docket No. 137.2 For the following reasons, this Court recommends that Judge Stearns deny Bloom’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Phinney v. Wentworth Douglas HospitalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  2. Michael Pagano v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  3. Sunview Condominium Ass'n v. Flexel International, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  4. CQ International Co. v. Rochem International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  5. Eldridge v. Gordon Brothers Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API