Legal Opinion

Oberstein v. Bisset

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 10, 1976No. Civ. 15361PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TAMURA, Acting P. J .

This appeal presents the question whether a trial court’s adoption of specification of reasons voluntarily drafted by counsel for the moving party constitutes acceptable compliance with the pertinent requirements of Code of Civil Procedure section 657.

Plaintiff obtained a jury verdict against defendant for $10,000 for personal injuries sustained in an automobile collision. Following a hearing on defendant’s motion for a new trial on all statutory grounds, the court made a minute order granting a new trial on the issue of damages only on the ground the award was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Stevens v. Parke, Davis & Co.California Supreme Court · 1973
  3. La Manna v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Dizon v. PopeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. Krueger v. MeyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Widener v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Tramell v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. Smith v. MoffatCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. Huffman v. PetersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Eltolad Music, Inc. v. April Music, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API